The Christians of Capadocia: The Ultimate Statement of Religious Conviction
Airfare Daily Deals eCigarettes Eyeglasses Hotels Jewelry Online Backup Online Dating Online Printing Online Tickets Skin Care Textbook Rentals Vitamins Web Hosting Weddings
Find thousands of shopping-related forums
SEARCH

The Christians of Capadocia: The Ultimate Statement of Religious Conviction

Capadocia was an underground city consisting of hundreds of miles of maze-like tunnels carved from the Turkish landscape. It is the place Saul made his most significant stand against the Roman assault against Christianity.
    The trials and tribulations of the first Christians are, of course, well documented both historically and Biblically.  The spreading of 'the word' throughout the Roman Empire--through the Near East, Asia, Mediterranean, and Rome itself--and the many sacrifices made by gentile Jews and pagans alike, is chronicled by several reknowned historians of the time as well as authors of the New Testament.  But while we can piece together much of the history surrounding Jesus' crucifixion, there is much we still don't know about many of the people who chose the Christian path--defiant of Orthodox Jews who saw them as blasphemous, and the Romans who saw them as enemies of the State.

     The New Testament tells us that in the aftermath of the crucifixion of Jesus, it soon became apparent to Rome's reining ruler, Claudius Drusus Nero, that this cult who had deemed Jesus "The Messiah" was not  losing faith as expected.  In light of the Christians' tenacity, Claudius decreed that they must all be eradicated for the good of the Empire by any means necessary.  So, converting to this new religion meant conscious resignation to Rome's persecution.  Yet, as is evident today, many people nevertheless chose this perilous path to salvation.  And no one was more instrumental in convincing them to do so than Paul, a former Jew born "Saul" who'd once dedicated his life to wiping the Christian cult off the face of the earth.  Tradition holds that on a journey to Damascus where Saul intended to mount a violent offensive against the subversive followers of Jesus, he experienced an epiphany; a spiritual awakening that would ultimately change not only his worldview, but the face and future of Christianity.  Becoming a fervent advocate for the Jesus movement, the newly-baptized "Paul" launched a zealous walking ministry believed to have covered 20,000 miles--from Damascus to Tarsus, Ephesus to Rome.  But what is most significant is the place he ended his journey.  A place called Capadocia, in central Turkey.  This is the focus of this writing.

     A visibly indescribable, seemingly man-made terrain of towering spires, cones, obelisks, and countless caves cut deep into solidified volcanic ash, geologists today believe this area was wholly created by massive volcanic eruptions that spewed a thick layer of ash 300 feet deep, covering 15,000 square miles.  Historically, Capadocia was known as home to a people whose chief economy was based on raising horses for the Roman army.  But once visited by Paul, these people came to be recognized as one of the most pious religious sects in all of the Roman Empire, ultimately playing an extraordinary role in perpetuating the Cult of Christ. 

     Soon after the population's conversion to Christianity, the breathtaking landscape of this unlikely crossroads of Asia and Europe became the mere facade of a unique fortress that developed in a most unique and phenomenal way over the next three centuries.  Although the sheer height of the terrain presented considerable protection from the Roman army (with whom they immediately fell at odds for their religious and trade betrayal), the Capadocians further utilized their cavernous environment by burrowing deeper and deeper into the mountain of limestone, eventually carving out hundreds of miles of maze-like tunnels that are believed to have ultimately housed tens of thousands of Christians,in numerous self-contained underground settlements.  Tens of thousands of individuals who would constitute the largest population of "new religion" adherents for over a century.

     Using modern ground-penetrating radar, archaeologists have in recent years discovered the true genius of this religious community who for the last decades of their existence were believed to have abandoned their habitat.  To sustain their cave-dwelling existence, the Capadocians not only had to be most clever artisans, they had to be extraordinary city planners and logisticians.  Found hidden behind huge rolling doors in the back recesses of their terrestrial churches were multiple secret passages leading to the city proper (suburban passageways leading to urban centers where huge marketplaces and tradecenters are thought to have existed).  As this city was constructed to be totally self-sustaining and isolated, every conceivable need had to be considered in this world that would not enjoy daylight for indefinite periods of time.  With some forty separate communities as deep as eight stories underground, archaeological evidence shows that these people lacked for nothing and did indeed thrive for centuries. 

     As an anthropologist specializing in religion and ritual behavior, I see religion as humankind's most remarkable institution; perhaps the ultimate human enigma.  Spirituality, devoutness, etherity, and piety reach far beyond our conscious minds into the deepest recesses of that which makes us what we are: intimately innate yet utterly unfathomable.  And should anyone ever need to question humankind's ultimate resolve or capacity for conviction, we need only consider the unlikely people of Capadocia.  I know of no more powerful statement of the human spirit. 

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
experts
in Philosophy on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Philosophy?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (8)
Ranked #3 in Philosophy

Interesting perspective on an area of great appreciation. I am studying for my PhD in Medieval European Archaeology.

Your remark about the 'cult of Jesus' is insensitive to Christians; since cult is defined as one of the below: Jesus, and those who follow Him, find your reference rude and self-serving. It does not belong in a Factoidz as an informational fact. cult definitions •followers of an exclusive system of religious beliefs and practices •fad: an interest followed with exaggerated zeal; "he always follows the latest fads"; "it was all the rage that season" •followers of an unorthodox, extremist, or false religion or sect who often live outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader •a religion or sect that is generally considered to be unorthodox, extremist, or false; "it was a satanic cult"

Ranked #15 in Philosophy

In anthropological, scientific terms, "cult" would be the proper term. Long before the term "Christian" was designated, the then off-shoot of Judasm would have been techniquically termed a "sect," a division of Judasm. But once becoming a separate religion its true designation would be "cult." By accepted definition, all relgions begin as "cults." This is not a subjective term but one of scientific definition. Therefore it is descriptive, appropriate, and not to be confused with "fad."

We are no longer in anthropological times - hence, the word 'cult' is your word denoting a time. I stand by my original statement - and I'm guessing that you are not a Christian or you would not be so insensitive to those who are. Science says a lot of things that refute God -- it is not descriptive to readers here - but to scientists, and not appropriate to Christians who are not confused about who Jesus is.

Ranked #15 in Philosophy

No longer in anthropological times? You clearly do not understand the term. If you ACTUALLY read the article, you will see that I am (like most anthropologists) quite sensitive to Christians and their beliefs and am actually praising their history and spiritual resolve. I respect all religions and spiritual perspectives.

You clearly are diffusing the subject of my comment. You used the word cult as your own - and it is insensitive - you could have used another word to denote the same thing. If it is not your own word, it would have been in quotes.

Ranked #15 in Philosophy

It may interest you and other readers to know that since this article was published 6 months ago, it has received over 300 hits and yours is the first taking exception. Most enlightened readers accept it as the informational piece that it is--and keep it in context. In fact, I have received 9 Emails highly praising this article. I wonder which of us is doing Christians a greater dis-service.

You don't have to 'wonder' - it's you who is using the word 'cult'. Only 300 hits in 6 months....?

ARTICLE DETAILS
RELATED ARTICLES
ARTICLE KEYWORDS